CO129-263 - Acting Governor Barker Governor Sir Robinson - 1894 [5-8] — Page 132

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

"Anquet "Supreme Court

18.

By Cash -

being

balance

" after paying distraint Nr 254/92

78..

I think it would have

accurate and

been

would have better described

the true state of the case if

4

paragraph

had run -

reference to the distraint we-

#

count which

was

at

arce

"produced proved the correct.

VILLA

20.

a

of this item."

The next paragraph

crisicions of

which is

C

voucher

not deserved, and

shows I submit that Mr Ni.

has taken

View

wrong Auditor of

wolle

of his duties.

av

the Receiver's

to

that he wishes not

audit the accounts.

accounts. It

seems

only to

but to criticise the Receiver's

management

129

management of the Estate.

Mr. Nicolle

says:-

21.

"It copy of the next item for $138.75 is attached, marked " D . " It is signed by the back. " rupt only

a jumble " of receipts and payments which the audit

no check.

and is

over

can exercia

his document is not

Jumble

to

any

are

who is

neg

quainted with mercantile.

documents.

It is

memorandum

in

showing clearly the details of the sum of $138.75 paid by the bankrupt and there are tive vouchers (account sales of consignments) anneyed. No doubt the Official Receiver be. fore receiving this account was quite satisfied', and therefore

the voucher

was

all that was

required

Edit History

2026-05-27 11:25:15 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
"Anquet "Supreme Court 18. By Cash - being balance " after paying distraint Nr 254/92 78.. I think it would have accurate and been would have better described the true state of the case if 4 paragraph had run - reference to the distraint we- # count which was at arce "produced proved the correct. VILLA 20. a of this item." The next paragraph crisicions of which is C voucher not deserved, and shows I submit that Mr Ni. has taken View wrong Auditor of wolle of his duties. av the Receiver's to that he wishes not audit the accounts. accounts. It seems only to but to criticise the Receiver's management 129 management of the Estate. Mr. Nicolle says:- 21. "It copy of the next item for $138.75 is attached, marked " D . " It is signed by the back. " rupt only a jumble " of receipts and payments which the audit no check. and is over can exercia his document is not Jumble to any are who is neg quainted with mercantile. documents. It is memorandum in showing clearly the details of the sum of $138.75 paid by the bankrupt and there are tive vouchers (account sales of consignments) anneyed. No doubt the Official Receiver be. fore receiving this account was quite satisfied', and therefore the voucher was all that was required
Baseline (Original)
"Anquet "Supreme Court 18. By Cash- being balance " after paying distraint Nr 254/92 78.. I think it would have accurate and been would have better described the true state of the case if 4 paragraph had run - reference to the distraint we- # count which was at arce "produced proved the correct. VILLA 20. a of this item." The next paragraph crisicions of which is C voucher not deserved, and shows I submit that Mr Ni. has taken View wrong Auditor of wolle of his duties. av the Receiver's to that he wishes not audit the accounts. accounts. It seems only to but to criticise the Receiver's management 129 management of the Estate. Mr. Nicolle says:- 21. "It copy of the next item for $138.75 is attached, marked " D . " It is signed by the back. " rupt only a jumble " of receipts and payments which the audit no check. and is over can exercia his document is not Jumble to any are who is neg quainted with mercantile. documents. It is memorandum in showing clearly the details of the sum of $138.75 paid by the bankrupt and there are tive vouchers (account sales of consignments) anneyed. No doubt the Official Receiver be. fore receiving this account was quite satisfied', and therefore the voucher was all that was required
2026-05-27 11:25:15 · Baseline
View content

"Anquet "Supreme Court

18.

By Cash-

being

balance

" after paying distraint Nr 254/92

78..

I think it would have

accurate and

been

would have better described

the true state of the case if

4

paragraph

had run -

reference to the distraint we-

#

count which

was

at

arce

"produced proved the correct.

VILLA

20.

a

of this item."

The next paragraph

crisicions of

which is

C

voucher

not deserved, and

shows I submit that Mr Ni.

has taken

View

wrong Auditor of

wolle

of his duties.

av

the Receiver's

to

that he wishes not

audit the accounts.

accounts. It

seems

only to

but to criticise the Receiver's

management

129

management of the Estate.

Mr. Nicolle

says:-

21.

"It copy of the next item for $138.75 is attached, marked " D . " It is signed by the back. " rupt only

a jumble " of receipts and payments which the audit

no check.

and is

over

can exercia

his document is not

Jumble

to

any

are

who is

neg

quainted with mercantile.

documents.

It is

memorandum

in

showing clearly the details of the sum of $138.75 paid by the bankrupt and there are tive vouchers (account sales of consignments) anneyed. No doubt the Official Receiver be. fore receiving this account was quite satisfied', and therefore

the voucher

was

all that was

required

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.